Home Industry Ecosystems Capabilities About Us Careers Contact Us
System Status
Online: 3K+ Agents Active
Digital Worker 5 AI Agents Active

Quality Defect Investigation Digital Worker

Implements a 5-agent ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) pattern system that processes defect images, classifies defect types, performs systematic root cause analysis with hypothesis testing, generates corrective actions, and validates recommendationsβ€”all with real-time reasoning transparency and IoT sensor integration..

5 AI Agents
6 Tech Stack
AI Orchestrated
24/7 Available
Worker ID: quality-defect-investigation-worker

Problem Statement

The challenge addressed

Manufacturing quality issues require rapid root cause analysis to prevent production losses and customer escapes. Manual investigation is slow, inconsistent, and fails to leverage historical patterns. Tribal knowledge is lost when experienced enginee...

Solution Architecture

AI orchestration approach

Implements a 5-agent ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) pattern system that processes defect images, classifies defect types, performs systematic root cause analysis with hypothesis testing, generates corrective actions, and validates recommendationsβ€”all wit...
Interface Preview 4 screenshots

AI Credit Engine Dashboard overview showcasing intelligent quality control system with expected business impact metrics and three-stage quality analysis workflow

Quality analysis configuration page displaying multi-agent architecture with orchestrator, vision analyzer, root cause investigator, and validation agents using LangGraph pattern

Real-time agent orchestration view showing AI agents collaborating with chain-of-thought reasoning, tool activity, and defect classification analysis in progress

Comprehensive analysis results presenting defect identification, root cause determination, financial impact assessment, and actionable recommendations with high confidence scores

Multi-Agent Orchestration

AI Agents

Specialized autonomous agents working in coordination

5 Agents
Parallel Execution
AI Agent

Orchestration Agent

Quality investigations require coordinated analysis across vision, data, and domain expertise. Ad-hoc coordination leads to incomplete investigations.

Core Logic

Manages the investigation workflow using task decomposition and priority-based agent coordination. Routes defect cases to appropriate specialist agents based on defect type and severity. Maintains investigation state and ensures all evidence is collected before conclusions. Handles escalation to human experts when confidence thresholds are not met. Tracks investigation SLAs and prioritizes based on production impact.

ACTIVE #1
View Agent
AI Agent

Vision Analyzer Agent

Visual defect identification requires trained inspectors and is subject to fatigue and inconsistency. New defect types may go unrecognized.

Core Logic

Processes defect images using convolutional neural networks trained on manufacturing defect taxonomies. Classifies defects into categories (surface, dimensional, structural, contamination) with confidence scores. Detects defect features including location, size, pattern, and severity. Identifies similar historical defects using image embedding similarity search. Flags novel defect patterns for human review and model retraining.

ACTIVE #2
View Agent
AI Agent

Root Cause Analyst Agent

Identifying true root causes requires systematic hypothesis testing against process data. Engineers often fix symptoms rather than causes, leading to recurrence.

Core Logic

Performs systematic root cause analysis using Ishikawa (fishbone) methodology across 6M categories (Man, Machine, Material, Method, Measurement, Mother Nature). Correlates defect occurrence with process parameter deviations using statistical analysis. Tests hypotheses against historical data patterns and sensor readings. Ranks contributing factors by evidence strength and causal probability. Documents evidence chains supporting conclusions.

ACTIVE #3
View Agent
AI Agent

Strategy Agent

Corrective action planning often focuses on quick fixes without considering cost-effectiveness, implementation feasibility, or long-term prevention.

Core Logic

Generates tiered action plans: immediate containment, short-term correction, and long-term prevention. Calculates Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) including scrap, rework, inspection, warranty, and reputation costs. Assesses implementation feasibility based on resource availability and production constraints.

ACTIVE #4
View Agent
AI Agent

Validation Agent

Recommended actions may be technically infeasible, violate constraints, or introduce new risks. Without validation, implementation fails or creates new problems.

Core Logic

Validates proposed actions against production constraints, equipment capabilities, and safety requirements. Checks for unintended consequences using process simulation and FMEA analysis. Verifies action feasibility with current resource levels and schedules. Confirms regulatory compliance for process changes. Assigns confidence scores to validated recommendations and flags items requiring engineering review.

ACTIVE #5
View Agent
Technical Details

Worker Overview

Technical specifications, architecture, and interface preview

System Overview

Technical documentation

A real-time quality intelligence system using LangGraph-based ReAct reasoning patterns to investigate manufacturing defects, correlate process parameters with quality outcomes, and generate validated corrective actions with autonomous process adjustment capabilities.

Tech Stack

6 technologies

Computer vision model for defect image classification

IoT sensor integration for real-time process parameters

Historical defect database with pattern matching

Statistical Process Control (SPC) calculation engine

Digital twin simulation integration

ML model feedback loop for continuous improvement

Architecture Diagram

System flow visualization

Quality Defect Investigation Digital Worker Architecture
100%
Rendering diagram...
Scroll to zoom β€’ Drag to pan